Ethereum Community Split Parity
5 min read

Ethereum Community Split on Response to Parity Exploit

By Editorial Team

Two days ago, the biggest exploit on an Ethereum smart contract took place. An amatuer developer managed to take control of some Parity multisig wallets and proceeded to accidentally kill referencing libraries. This had the effect of freezing over $150m in ETH and making it unspendable.

This is particularly bad news for the developer behind this particular multisig wallet. Parity was hit by a similar hack in July that saw clients losing $30m in ETH and upon fixing that bug they were unable to spot this one. However this transpired, the exploit and resulting fund freeze has ignited a strong debate in the Ethereum community.

If there is anything to go by, one can take a look at the DAO hack that took place last year. In that hack, about $50m of ETH was hit. Yet, in this case the loss is almost three times as much. With the DAO hack, there was a great debate that rage and eventually the community decided to hardfork the chain in order to recover the funds.

This decision led to a contentious split and the creation of Ethereum classic. Can the Ethereum network risk such a split and does it create a moral hazard? How will investor confidence be harmed with a loss of $150m?

Contract Developers to Blame?

Many in the Ethereum community are pointing to the fact that the problem was not with Ethereum but was the smart contract that was built on top of it. The Ethereum protocol worked just as intended. FunFair founder Jez Obe stated that:

It emphasizes what we already knew, that writing smart contracts is hard and that we’re still learning best practices and the chance to introduce bugs is still present

The whole idea of how code is immutable is part of the advantages of Blockchain. However, this also means that the bugs that may be inside these smart contracts is also immutable.

Although there has been a lot that has been done on Ethereum in terms of security since the DAO, one cannot claim conclusively that it is 100% secure for such large amounts of money. Many are pointing the finger at Parity claiming that they should have audited the code properly after the July multisig hack.

However, Parity strongly denies that they were irresponsible. They claimed that they did indeed do a full audit before the patch was released. They say that it was also audited by ZK Labs before they released it.

Should Ethereum be Examined?

There are some who think that the problem may indeed lie with Ethereum itself. They claim that it can be easy to dismiss the bug as a bad contract and not focus on the reasons why that bug could have come about. For example, some are taking issue with the language used to code smart contracts. Charlie lee, the creator of Litecoin said:

The Solidity language for writing ethereum contracts is one of the worst languages to use if you want to write bug-free code

Johnson Lau, a developer over at Bitcoin Core did not mince his words when he responded to the incident on Twitter

https://twitter.com/johnsonlau01/status/927908045354496000

Perhaps the lack of security on the contracts that are being developed are as a result of past actions by the Ethereum community. Allowing for funds to be returned after the DAO hack could have created a feeling of complacency when coding such critically important contracts.

Some are of the view that with so much of someone else’s money at stake in these contracts, there may come a point at which lawyers get involved. Can the state intervene in a massive dispute if a particular party is being sued? Will lawyers be able to force the hand of these developers?

Where does The Community Stand?

Right now the Ethereum community as a whole has to decide how they should react to the incident. The only way to recover the funds is through a hardfork and, as we mentioned, these are contentious enough. However, in this case many feel that “bailing out” irresponsible developers is a moral hazard that will make the next contract just as unsafe.

On the other side of the debate you have those who lost funds through no fault of their own. How can they ever have faith in the system again? Moreover, there are many who have not invested in Ethereum and they could see this as enough reason to avoid it all together. This could lead to Ethereum failing when it comes to mass adoption.

With a really small sample size of 1,000 twitter users at press time, Local Ethereum asked whether the chain should fork to save the funds.

At time of writing close to 60% of the respondents said no. Whether this is a genuine belief is hard to tell. There are many who see the elimination of so much ETH a positive for the price short term. Yet, this may undermine long term predictions as confidence wanes.

There are some who are trying to remain optimistic about the situation. There are a great deal of incredibly smart white hat hackers in the Ethereum community. The hope is that these individuals could try and find a way to somehow unfreeze the funds. We should not forget that when parity was hacked in July it was these same hackers who managed to rescue a great deal of funds before too much damage was done.

Featured Image via Fotolia

Editors at large. Posting the latest news, reviews and analysis to hit the blockchain.
View all posts by Editorial Team -> Best Crypto Deals ->

Latest Posts

PrimeXBT vs Bybit 2022: Which Exchange is Best for Crypto Trading?

PrimeXBT vs Bybit 2022: Which Exchange is Best for Crypto Trading?

September 27, 2022 26 min read
How to Buy Bitcoin on Binance

How to Buy Bitcoin on Binance

September 26, 2022 7 min read
How to buy Polkadot at FTX
How to Buy Polkadot (DOT) on FTX Exchange
How to buy Polkadot at FTX

How to Buy Polkadot (DOT) on FTX Exchange

September 23, 2022 9 min read
Crypto Safety 101: How to Protect your Crypto

Crypto Safety 101: How to Protect your Crypto

September 22, 2022 44 min read
Blockchain Security: How to Understand Blockchain Audits to Stay Safe in DeFi

Blockchain Security: How to Understand Blockchain Audits to Stay Safe in DeFi

September 21, 2022 26 min read
IDEX Review
IDEX Review 2022: The First Hybrid Approach to Non-Custodial, High-Performance Crypto Trading
IDEX Review

IDEX Review 2022: The First Hybrid Approach to Non-Custodial, High-Performance Crypto Trading

September 14, 2022 37 min read
Using Modern Portfolio Theory to Build a Crypto Portfolio
Using Modern Portfolio Theory and How to Build a Crypto Portfolio
Using Modern Portfolio Theory to Build a Crypto Portfolio

Using Modern Portfolio Theory and How to Build a Crypto Portfolio

September 12, 2022 48 min read

Related Posts

Crypto Safety 101: How to Protect your Crypto

Crypto Safety 101: How to Protect your Crypto

September 22, 2022 44 min read
Blockchain Security: How to Understand Blockchain Audits to Stay Safe in DeFi

Blockchain Security: How to Understand Blockchain Audits to Stay Safe in DeFi

September 21, 2022 26 min read
Top 5 Crypto Scams to Avoid in 2022

Top 5 Crypto Scams to Avoid in 2022

September 7, 2022 30 min read
What is Etherscan and how to use it
Etherscan Review: Public Face of Ethereum
What is Etherscan and how to use it

Etherscan Review: Public Face of Ethereum

August 30, 2022 16 min read
Can you still make money mining Monero
Can You Still Make Money Mining Monero in 2022?
Can you still make money mining Monero

Can You Still Make Money Mining Monero in 2022?

August 27, 2022 16 min read
Crypto Staking Complete Guide
Stake and Earn: Complete Guide to Staking Crypto
Crypto Staking Complete Guide

Stake and Earn: Complete Guide to Staking Crypto

August 25th, 2022 33 min read
What is a rug pull
Crypto Rug Pulls: How To AVOID Them and Keep SAFE!
What is a rug pull

Crypto Rug Pulls: How To AVOID Them and Keep SAFE!

August 13, 2022 15 min read